Category Archives: Politics

Strike wave part of Egyptian revolt, includes Suez Canal workers

A strike wave in Egypt is adding weight to the democracy movement there, according to press reports. As in many authoritarian regimes there is an “official” Egyptian trade union movement set up to keep workers in line, but that has not stopped independent organizing efforts in the country. (For more on the phenomenon of authoritarianism and the global labor movement see my book on the topic here.)

Now there is a strike underway by workers on the Suez Canal, though details are sketchy. A BBC news crew was detained on its way to cover the strike and sent packing by the authorities.

A sign of the bravery of the movement was the willingness of some workers to protest outside the government controlled union federation itself (picture at left). While the strikes are focused on economic demands their timing indicates a clear tie to the broader social movement underway in the country.

Egypt protesters seek to spread beyond Tahrir Square – CSMonitor.com.

Today’s Times has more details here.

Egypt’s unfinished revolution

Today was a good day for the Egyptian revolution…the people are not backing down despite clear awareness that they are up against Mubarak, the Egyptian military that he controls and the US Government that is sticking with the regime in its call for an “orderly” transition, which is sounding almost fascistic in quality compared to the clear desires of the Egyptian majority.

BBC News – Analysis: Egypt’s unfinished revolution.

Stanford Historian Joel Beinin on labor role in Egyptian revolution

As I have said several times, the Egyptian working class is a critical factor in the current events. Historian Joel Beinin at Stanford is an expert on the labor movement in Egypt and was interviewed recently about the current situation.

Historian Joel Beinin on the Egyptian Labor Crisis.

You can learn more by reading this report authored by Joel for the AFL-CIO. Joel also has a very useful chapter in this edited collection on the authoritarian character of neo-liberal reforms in Egypt.

What’s next in Egypt: first Mubarak, then the military?

Slate ran this piece in December deftly anticipating recent events in Egypt. As it makes clear, the removal of Mubarak is meaningless unless the democratic revolution underway in Egypt dismantles the military industrial complex atop of which Mubarak sat.

Yet, all signs point to the US backing that military in a transition to the post-Mubarak era. We are setting ourselves up here for a confrontation with the people in Egypt when they move beyond Mubarak and confront the true power structure of their country. Of course, the US government has no choice – the military and Mubarak have been key to overseeing the neo-liberal reforms of the last 20 years. In Egypt as elsewhere authoritarianism is the face of the globalization process in much of the world, from China to the mideast.

It is time for the United States to rethink its global policy – if the price of our place in the world is to get in bed with the brutal Egyptian military we are paying too high a price.

A WikiLeaks cable shows how Egypt’s regime has bought off the military – Slate Magazine.

Democracy in Egypt under US backed Mubarak regime – No voters needed

Barnard College Professor Mona El-Ghobashy describes the tape linked below:

“The defining image from 2010 [elections in Egypt] was a surreptitiously shot four-minute video of a voter-free polling station in the Bilbays district of the Delta province of Sharqiyya. Two poll workers calmly filled out ballot after ballot, stacks of which were then carried off by other civil servants to be stuffed in boxes off camera.”

YouTube – فضيحة انتخابات فى بلبيس 28 11 2010.

“DeMaurice Smith Takes On the N.F.L. Owners”

The NY Times profile of new NFL union leader DeMaurice Smith indicates he is putting to work all the key elements of successful union leadership: a strategic plan, internal union education, building good relationships with fellow unions and making a credible argument to the wider public.

It will be an uphill battle for the union, as always, but Smith comes to the table with a great skill set for the job as a former federal prosecutor and corporate lawyer. What he lacks in union experience itself he seems to be committed to making up quickly.

I like this guy.

DeMaurice Smith Takes On the N.F.L. Owners – NYTimes.com.

Fragile Pakistan a sacrifice to IMF?

The Financial Times published my letter today pointing out the absurdity that the IMF is pressing Pakistan to repay a loan to the point of cracking open the fragile governing coalition there. The result has been price hikes for gas and the assassination last week of a key governor.

At at time when the US and other countries are sending young men and women to die in the region why are we making it more difficult for the first liberal Pakistan government in many years to help?

My blogging colleague Pundita has been following Pakistan closely for many years and for those who wish more background are recommended to click on the link to her site.

FT.com / Comment / Letters – Fragile Pakistan a sacrifice to IMF?.

Law professors gather at AALS meeting in San Francisco, violating union boycott

Sadly, one of my professional associations, the Association of American Law Schools, decided to go ahead with its annual meeting this weekend at San Francisco hotels despite a union boycott in place to support collective bargaining.  Pro-union law professors have attempted to organize support for the hotel workforce and will hold a rally in San Francisco on Friday, January 7. (A website on the rally is now here.)  In a frustratingly ineffective effort to gain support for the union (there were a few exceptions, thankfully) I sent the following letters out to colleagues at Santa Clara as well as the head of the AALS’ securities regulation group:

Colleagues,

An end of term reminder that the AALS meeting this year is being held at a hotel that is under an official boycott by the union that represents its employees for failure to agree on a new collective bargaining agreement.  Hilton is owned by the giant private equity group Blackstone which posted a 13% increase in profits last year but is refusing their workforce a modest increase in pay and benefits.  An informational picket line is possible (as was the case during the recent meetings of the African Studies Association in San Francisco) and I have asked my AALS section, Securities Law, to move the meeting to a neutral venue such as a local law school.  The letter I sent to my section is below.

In light of our law school’s longstanding commitment to equity and social justice I hope you can find a way to express your support for the labor force of the hotels such as by boycotting the AALS meetings, writing a letter in support of the workers to the AALS, many of them first or second generation Americans earning a fraction of what lawyers or academics earn, and asking your sections or panels to move to another venue.  My understanding is that San Francisco law schools are making space available for various events.

For more information including whether or not a picket line will be present at the hotel, see this union website:

Sincerely,

Stephen F. Diamond

Associate Professor of Law

Santa Clara University School of Law

Hi, Elizabeth,

I appreciate your solicitation of member reactions to the situation at Hilton. I, for one, would not be willing to cross a picket line. My grandparents were lifelong trade unionists in San Francisco and in fact participated in the 1934 General Strike there. I was in the labor movement before law school and my experiences then had a lot to do with my decision to become a lawyer and law professor.

I had planned to attend AALS sessions this year but now have to reconsider. So I would hope that rescheduling at nearby law schools (we could likely accommodate some folks at SCU but that is about an hour south) or union friendly hotels is feasible.  Otherwise I believe we should cancel the sessions in support of the collective bargaining process.

I would also suggest, however, contacting the union to find out the status of negotiations since January is a long ways away still and so there is always the possibility of a settlement.

Hope this is helpful.  Please feel free to share my views as you see fit.

Best,

Steve Diamond